Remember when mobile apps were supposed to kill web software? Or when no-code was going to make developers obsolete?
Every few years, there’s a new SaaS killer. And almost every time, what happens is the opposite: SaaS gets stronger, founders spot new openings, and new categories show up.
Rob Walling (who’s started six companies, invested in 200 plus startups, and written five books over two decades) has heard the “end of SaaS” story plenty of times. His take on the latest wave is clear: AI agents won’t kill your SaaS startup, but they will change how the best products are built, sold, and used.
This post breaks down what AI agents are, why people think they threaten SaaS, what’s actually true, and the one mistake founders can’t afford to make right now.
Past panics and why SaaS keeps coming back
Software history has a pattern: a new trend arrives, fear spikes, hot takes spread, then reality settles in.
Here are a few “this will end SaaS” moments many founders remember:
- Mobile apps will replace web apps
- No-code will replace developers
- Automation tools will replace SaaS workflows
- A new platform layer will sit on top of everything and take the value
What changed each time wasn’t the need for software, it was where value concentrated.
SaaS didn’t survive because founders ignored the shifts. It survived because founders adapted, moved up the stack, and kept doing what SaaS does best: turn messy real-world work into repeatable workflows, with a database behind it, and rules that don’t wobble.
That’s also the right frame for AI agents. The fear isn’t “AI exists.” The fear is that agents will do everything through natural language, and SaaS will turn into a commodity. That’s the anxiety. But it skips over how businesses actually operate day-to-day.
If you’re building and growing a SaaS startup, the goal is not to debate extremes. It’s to understand what changes, what stays the same, and how to win in the middle.
For a broader look at how tiny teams and new tooling are shaping company-building, this piece on funding trends for lean AI SaaS startups pairs well with the shift Rob is describing.
What exactly are AI agents?
An AI agent is a software program that can take actions and make decisions on its own, based on goals, instructions, and real-time data.
That “take actions” part matters. It’s not just a chatbot answering questions. It can do work.
A simple way to think about the difference:
- Traditional software: follows predefined rules written by a developer.
- AI agents: can learn, adapt, and automate tasks more dynamically.
Examples Rob mentions are the kind people immediately relate to:
- booking appointments
- summarizing emails
- analyzing reports
- completing tasks without constant human input
In practice, this feels like having a smart assistant that can handle a chunk of the busywork, then loop you in when a decision is needed.
That power is real, and it’s why people are nervous.
The fear factor: why people think AI agents will kill SaaS
The “agents kill SaaS” story usually comes from a few related beliefs.
1) “We won’t need SaaS user interfaces anymore”
The argument goes like this: if a user can just type what they want in plain English, the agent can do the work by calling the product’s API. Some folks even talk about ACIs (Agent Communication Interfaces), meaning interfaces designed specifically for agents to talk to software.
So the fear becomes: if the UI matters less, does the product matter less?
2) “Glue SaaS will disappear”
Another worry is that entire classes of tools that connect SaaS products will go away, because agents can connect systems on their own.
3) “Agents become the layer on top of everything”
In the most extreme version, you get one agent layer that sits above many SaaS tools, and users interact with the agent, not the tools. That becomes the doomsday scenario: agents replace the need for all SaaS.
If you want to see the strongest version of the “agents eat SaaS” argument, this essay gives a clear view of that side: AI agents are starting to eat SaaS.
Rob’s view is different, and it starts with a reality check.
Reality check: what agents can do, and what they can’t
Agents are good at fetching information and automating simple workflows. That’s already useful.
But businesses don’t optimize for “smart,” they optimize for predictable.
Even if you imagine a near future where agents are far better than today, there are hard constraints that don’t vanish:
- Teams still need a system of record.
- Someone still needs to manage work, audit it, and report on it.
- Compliance, security, and governance don’t tolerate “kind of right.”
This is where SaaS stays strong.
Why AI agents won’t kill your SaaS startup
SaaS remains the database of record
Rob compares agents to adding people to your team.
If you hire an assistant, an SDR, a customer success manager, a salesperson, or even more developers, you still need software to:
- interface with them
- manage tasks
- track what’s happening
- report on results
Agents are similar. Even if they do a lot, you still need a place where the truth lives. That “truth” is usually a SaaS product with structured data and rules.
Most customers won’t build their own tools
A point Rob makes that’s easy to miss: just because people can build with no-code or AI, doesn’t mean they will.
He uses a simple example. A dentist could probably put something together with tools like Airtable or Bubble, but they’re far more likely to buy prepackaged dental practice management software.
The same logic applies across industries. Most professionals don’t want to assemble software. They want software that matches their world and works on day one.
That’s why a SaaS startup that solves a real, specific problem still has a strong market, even as agent tools improve.
Agents are usually automation layers, not standalone businesses
Agents today are mostly layers that sit on top of existing systems, enhancing them:
- improving efficiency
- reducing friction
- creating new workflows inside existing SaaS products
A useful analogy is what happened with integration tools. Zapier and Make tie SaaS products together. They didn’t kill SaaS, they made SaaS more valuable by connecting it.
Spreadsheets are another example. They didn’t kill accounting software. They became part of how people work.
Agents follow the same path. They integrate into SaaS.
SaaS is more than a UI
A lot of people talk about SaaS like it’s a bundle of screens. That’s not why businesses pay.
SaaS value is often:
- workflows that match how work is done
- compliance requirements baked in
- data handling and governance
- business logic that’s consistent every time
Agents can hallucinate, and even small errors can be expensive. A SaaS product with hard-coded business logic can be locked down to do exactly what the business needs, when it needs it.
That combination of reliability plus domain fit is hard to replace with a general agent layer.
If you want a more enterprise-focused view of the same question, this debate summary is a solid reference point: The Great Debate: Will Agentic AI Kill SaaS?
How AI agents will change SaaS (and where founders should focus)
AI agents won’t erase SaaS, but they will push SaaS to evolve in clear ways.
Less UI, more API and ACI-first thinking
Rob expects fewer UI interactions over time, with more “interface through agents.”
That means SaaS products will need to think beyond UI-first design:
- stronger APIs
- agent-friendly interfaces (ACIs)
- clear permissions and audit trails for agent actions
This isn’t a “drop everything today” warning. It’s more like a direction of travel. As you build new features, it’s smart to think about how agents might interact with them.
A tighter value proposition around the core
If agents handle more of the surface-level clicking, the product gets reduced to what it really is:
- the database
- the workflow engine
- the business logic
- the domain knowledge baked into the product
Less time will be spent selling “screens.” More time will be spent selling outcomes, reliability, and fit.
The best SaaS companies will integrate AI deeply
Rob’s advice is direct: if you have a SaaS today, why wouldn’t you build your own agents on top of it?
The winner pattern looks like this:
- internal agents that help users get more value from the product
- external interfaces that allow other agents to interact safely
- AI features that make customers faster, not just impressed
This is similar to older shifts. Mobile changed access patterns. Cloud moved deployment. APIs became essential (Rob points out that 10 to 12 years ago, APIs started becoming standard, and it helped tools like Zapier rise).
Those changes didn’t end SaaS. They changed what “good SaaS” looks like.
For an example of building an AI-first audience and using AI without losing the human edge, this story is worth reading: lessons from a 2M-subscriber AI newsletter startup.
MicroConf Mastermind Matching (peer groups for SaaS founders)
Rob also highlights something that matters when the market feels noisy: having a trusted peer group.
MicroConf runs a program that matches founders into small mastermind groups using criteria like revenue level, team size, location, and industry. They’ve matched over 1,000 founders.
If that sounds useful, MicroConf shares details through their Mastermind Matching program. Applications mentioned in the video were open until March 31.
The one critical mistake founders make with AI
The biggest mistake isn’t picking the wrong agent tool.
It’s burying your head in the sand.
Rob describes it as AI exhaustion or AI fatigue. There’s so much hype and noise that some founders decide to ignore the whole thing because they don’t know what to do next.
That’s risky, because there are practical steps that matter even if you don’t want to chase trends:
- Use AI in your day-to-day internal operations where it saves time.
- Consider where AI fits into your product features and customer experience.
- Start thinking about how agents might need to interact with your application over time.
One more warning he adds is platform risk. If you over-rely on one provider, you can get burned. He points viewers to a follow-up video on that topic: platform risk in SaaS explained for founders.
For a broader view of what may shift next, he also references: SaaS trends to watch heading into 2025.
If you want a quick, mainstream snapshot of how split expert opinions are right now, this overview is helpful: Will AI agents eat the SaaS market? Experts are split.
What I learned from watching SaaS “killer” cycles
The most useful lesson from these hype waves is that extreme opinions are usually wrong.
There’s always someone saying, “This changes nothing.” There’s always someone saying, “This changes everything.”
Real life is almost always in the middle.
When a shift is real (and AI agents are real), ignoring it is a mistake. When a shift is hyped, overreacting is also a mistake. The founders who do best are the ones who stay calm, keep shipping, and adjust the product in ways that increase customer value.
The other personal takeaway is simpler: if customers trust your SaaS app to hold their data and run their process, they don’t want randomness. They want the same answer on Tuesday that they got on Monday. That’s why strong workflows and clear logic stay valuable, even if agents become common.
Conclusion: AI agents change SaaS, they don’t replace it
AI agents are going to change how software gets used. Expect fewer clicks, more agent-driven actions, and more pressure to support APIs and agent interfaces well.
But the heart of a SaaS startup, the database of record, the workflows, the compliance, the security, and the domain logic, stays valuable because businesses pay for predictability.
The founders who win won’t panic or freeze. They’ll keep their product grounded in real workflows, add AI where it improves outcomes, and design for a future where agents are part of the stack, not the whole stack.
0 Comments