What’s Actually Happening in SaaS Right Now (AI, Churn, and Real Moats)

What’s Actually Happening in SaaS Right Now


People keep saying AI is going to be the death of saas startup companies. That makes for a punchy headline, but it doesn’t match what’s happening when you look at real products, real customers, and what founders are actually shipping.

Right now, the story looks more like this: a flood of AI-powered apps, lots of excitement, and a lot of churn for products that don’t have a reason to exist once the novelty wears off. At the same time, strong SaaS businesses are quietly getting stronger by adding AI in the right places.

 Photo source: Pexels

The AI hype isn’t matching reality

If AI was automatically “the next SaaS,” we’d see clean results across the board. Instead, the market is sending mixed signals.

One example getting attention is an MIT-linked finding that 95% of organizations are seeing zero return on generative AI investments. That number has been widely discussed, including in this breakdown of the report in Fortune: MIT report coverage on 95% of generative AI pilots failing.

At the product level, there’s another pattern: AI-native companies struggling with churn. Many users try an AI tool once, get what they need, then cancel. Or they realize the output isn’t reliable enough for serious work.

A simple way to summarize the core risk is this:

“If AI is doing 80% or 90% of the work, it’s easy to copy or bypass.”

Here’s the shape of what’s showing up most often:

  • A huge volume of AI-powered SaaS apps getting launched
  • A small number that feel durable
  • A large middle that will likely disappear within a year or two

What’s really happening in B2B SaaS today

In B2B SaaS, AI is showing up in two very different ways.

Existing SaaS companies are adding AI where it makes sense

If you already have a real product, real positioning, real customers, and any kind of moat, AI can be a strong addition.

The best use cases tend to be practical:

  • AI that speeds up parts of a workflow
  • AI that helps users find information faster
  • AI that reduces repetitive work inside the product
  • AI that improves internal operations (support, sales research, marketing execution)

The key is that the product’s value can’t depend entirely on the model. The product still needs structure, clear workflows, and a reason customers trust it.

New “thin layer over AI” apps are flooding the market

A lot of newer apps are basically a light interface sitting on top of an LLM. The issue isn’t that this approach is “bad,” it’s that it’s often fragile.

If your software isn’t doing much beyond prompting a model, it’s hard to defend long-term. Customers can switch to a competitor quickly, or they can just do the same task directly inside ChatGPT or another tool.

Laptop and desk workspace, typical SaaS founder setup

Problem 1: No moat (easy to copy, easy to replace)

When AI does most of the work:

  • It’s easy for competitors to recreate your app fast
  • It’s easy for customers to skip your tool and do it themselves
  • As models improve every week or month, the “special thing” your app does can get absorbed by the base model or a larger platform

If your SaaS code isn’t chaining steps, managing approvals, handling edge cases, integrating with the tools businesses already run on, and saving meaningful time, the customer has little reason to pay.

Problem 2: High churn is common (and often fatal)

High churn shows up for two main reasons:

  1. Big promises don’t match real results. A headline can promise “save 100 hours a month” or “write better copy than your best writer.” If the product falls short, users cancel.
  2. The app solves a one-time problem. If the customer only needs it once every quarter, or once every six months, a subscription is a tough sell.

In a SaaS business, 8% to 10% monthly churn is already painful. 15% to 20% churn is a business on fire, even if revenue is growing fast in the short run.

Problem 3: Cool ideas, poor execution (especially in high-risk verticals)

Some of the most interesting ideas are in vertical SaaS, like legal or government workflows, where teams deal with massive documents and dense text.

The pitch is compelling: “Let AI read all of this so humans don’t have to.”

The problem is execution and risk:

  • hallucinations
  • liability
  • incorrect summaries that create real-world consequences

AI can help here, but the bar is higher. It has to be dependable, auditable, and safe enough for real work.

Business team reviewing documents, common in legal and compliance workflows Photo source: Pexels

The market isn’t “anti-AI,” it’s anti-fragile products

Strong AI SaaS exists. Some investors are backing these companies, and customers are paying for them. But the majority of the AI apps getting launched right now are landing in the same traps: weak moats, weak retention, and unreliable outputs.

If you want a useful lens on how hype cycles form and why they shake out this way, this internal breakdown is a good companion read: Understanding the AI bubble and what it means for founders.

Why AI won’t kill SaaS (we’ve seen this movie before)

SaaS has been “about to die” many times.

We’ve watched waves like:

  • better programming languages and frameworks
  • visual builders
  • no-code tools
  • automation platforms

Each time, the prediction was the same: “Now anyone can build software, so we won’t need SaaS companies.”

But businesses don’t optimize for “customization at any cost.” They optimize for:

  • predictability
  • usability
  • security
  • support
  • compliance
  • integrations that don’t break

Even if a dentist could generate a custom tool with AI, they probably won’t. They don’t want to maintain it for years, handle edge cases, deal with security, and keep it updated while running a practice.

Tools like Zapier and Make didn’t kill SaaS. They took a slice of the market and expanded what people could automate. AI will do something similar.

SaaS moats are still real (and often boring)

The strongest moats still look like this:

  • Compliance and security requirements that aren’t optional
  • Data governance and audit trails
  • Deep integrations with the rest of the customer’s stack
  • Structured workflows that match how teams actually operate
  • Domain knowledge baked into the product, not bolted on

AI is good at fetching information and automating simple workflows. It’s not replacing the entire structure that businesses rely on.

What AI will change inside SaaS

AI will still reshape the category in real ways:

  • Fewer, broader products: some smaller utilities will get built internally with AI instead of bought.
  • Some market share shifts: a portion of “simple tools” may get replaced by custom scripts and internal apps (but many companies won’t want to host, maintain, and update them forever).
  • UI changes: as agentic AI improves, more interactions may move toward APIs and machine-to-machine workflows (including ideas like MCP, where tools coordinate through standard protocols), and less toward clicking through screens for every action.

The best SaaS companies won’t treat AI like a checkbox. They’ll integrate it deeply where it improves speed and results without sacrificing trust.

Abstract AI concept image, often used to represent generative AI in SaaS Photo source: Pexels

MicroConf Connect: where founders talk about the real stuff

One of the fastest ways to stay grounded as a founder is to spend time around other builders who are dealing with the same problems.

MicroConf Connect is positioned as a virtual hallway track with vetted founders, active channels, and ongoing discussions about real founder problems like pricing, outreach, and landing page feedback. Here’s the official page: MicroConf Connect SaaS community.

My personal experience and what I learned (watching AI SaaS up close)

After seeing a large volume of AI-powered SaaS ideas up close, one lesson keeps repeating: AI doesn’t fix a weak business.

A lot of founders sound confident because the demo is impressive. But once you ask basic business questions, the foundation isn’t there:

  • Who is the buyer, specifically?
  • What pain does this solve weekly, not yearly?
  • Why will the customer keep paying after month one?
  • What happens when a bigger competitor copies the core feature?

The most common failure mode is not bad tech. It’s building a product where AI is the main value, but the product doesn’t do enough beyond that to stay needed.

Another thing that stands out is how many teams try to skip the boring parts: positioning, retention, and workflow design. Those are the parts that keep a SaaS company alive.

If you want a concrete checklist for avoiding early false signals (especially around fit, pricing, and who the real customer is), this guide is a solid reference: Avoid these startup product-market fit mistakes.

Where bootstrapped founders should focus right now

AI is moving fast. That can make it feel like you’re behind even when you’re doing fine. The fix isn’t to chase every new model release, it’s to put AI in the right place in your business.

1) Use AI to bolster your operations (sales and marketing included)

AI can help across internal work:

  • drafting and editing outbound emails
  • research for sales calls
  • first-pass content and outlines
  • support replies and internal docs

Used this way, AI is a multiplier. It doesn’t need to become your product to be valuable.

2) Integrate AI into your product only when it drives customer outcomes

Adding AI “because you should” is how you end up with a feature that demos well but doesn’t retain.

A better filter is: what end result does the customer get, and how often do they get it?

If AI improves speed, accuracy, or completion rates inside an existing workflow, it can be a win. If it’s a standalone magic trick, churn is waiting.

3) Keep your eyes on fundamentals (the stuff AI can’t save)

For any saas startup, fundamentals still decide the outcome:

  1. Solve a real pain point.
  2. Do it well.
  3. Find customers consistently.
  4. Keep customers from churning.

A product with weak retention doesn’t turn into a good business just because it has an AI label.

If you want a smart example of validating demand before you build too much, this story is worth reading: Validate your AI SaaS idea with early revenue (pre-selling before launch).

Simple chart and planning visuals, useful for thinking about churn and retention Photo source: Pexels

Conclusion: SaaS isn’t dying, weak SaaS is

AI is changing software, but it’s not deleting the need for SaaS. It’s putting pressure on products with no moat, sloppy execution, and churn that never calms down. The winners will be teams that build SaaS + AI, keep workflows tight, and earn trust in industries that care about accuracy and reliability.

If you’re building right now, focus on retention and real value first, then add AI where it helps. That’s how you build something that lasts when the hype cycle moves on.

Post a Comment

0 Comments